Whatever
happens to Greece, the failings of the euro zone have not
been
addressed
Greece
beyond the edge
The
Economist, February 18th, 2012
Bill Hicks, a
comedian, used to joke that there must be a “ledge beyond
the edge”. How else could the survival of Keith Richards be
explained? What goes for rock stars also appears to go for
Greece, which has been on the brink of a second bail-out
package for weeks.
Deadlines
have already been missed. A meeting of the Eurogroup of
finance ministers, scheduled for February 15th, at which the
terms of a deal were supposed to have been endorsed, was
postponed the day before. Euro-zone ministers wanted more
details of proposed spending cuts as well as written
assurances that Greek politicians won’t renege on the deal
once a general election, pencilled in for April 8th, is over.
Greece has consistently missed its targets to date; trust
among its troika of rescuers—euro-zone governments, the IMF
and the European Central Bank (ECB)—that it will stick to a
new agreement is low.
The
delays may reflect the brinkmanship that is part of any tough
negotiation. Greece is short of cash but not of bargaining
chips. Without fresh bail-out money, it faces a chaotic
default on its public debt. That might provoke wider
contagion. Its rescuers, for their part, are putting pressure
on Greece to commit to further austerity and reform by
sounding sure that fallout from a messy default could be
contained.
The
way financial markets shrugged off news of the cancelled
summit suggests that investors are confident that a deal can
still be reached when the Eurogroup next meets on February
20th. There is a deadline that ought to concentrate minds:
Greece has a €14.4 billion ($18.8 billion) bond that falls
due on March 20th.
A
scheme under which private investors would “voluntarily”
take losses, by swapping their Greek bonds for longer-dated
ones with half the face value, has to be completed before
then. Around €30 billion of the second bail-out pot is set
aside for guaranteed euro-zone bonds to sweeten the swap deal.
The process may have to start before that money is in place,
which will make some bondholders reluctant to take part. The
deal could easily unravel.
The
pressures on Greece are even more acute. Its economy shrank by
7% in the year to the fourth quarter of 2011. The fall in GDP
in the final three months of 2011 was around 5%, according to
Haver Analytics, compared with an average fall of 0.3% across
the whole euro area. That made the Greek economy the worst of
a sorry bunch (see chart). Uncertainty is the economy’s
biggest problem. Businesses will not invest until Greece’s
future in the euro is secure; nor will suppliers extend Greek
firms credit, worsening a savage liquidity shortage.
Greece
has missed its fiscal targets, in part because of the
deepening recession. The budget deficit in 2011 was probably
close to 10% of GDP, barely changed from 2010. But European
leaders agreed on €130 billion for Greece in October and are
loth to ask their parliaments to approve a bigger sum now. The
ECB will have to forgo the profits on the Greek bonds it
bought at a discount if Greece is to have a chance of cutting
its debt burden to 120% of GDP by 2020. More immediately,
Greece has been asked to make €3.3 billion of extra cuts
this year. That will prolong the recession. Private-sector
wage cuts needed to restore Greece’s competitiveness will
make things worse in the short term.
The
growing social tensions in Greece mean its politicians cannot
embrace yet more cuts with much enthusiasm. But Greece’s
official creditors have their own reasons to get cold feet
about another rescue package. Most of the new bail-out money
will be disbursed this year to cover Greece’s big budget
deficit; to enhance the bond-swap deal; and to inject capital
into Greek banks after they have taken losses when privately
held Greek bonds are restructured. Once this rescue money is
paid, euro-zone governments will have fewer means of taking
Greece to task.
What’s
more, from 2013 Greece is supposed to sustain a series of
“primary” budget surpluses (ie, excluding interest
payments) so as to cut its debt burden. But once the state has
eliminated its primary deficit, it will not need external
finance to fund its day-to-day operations. If Greece then
refuses to run big surpluses, a second round of debt
restructuring would beckon. That would hurt official
creditors, as well as the remaining private bondholders.
One
way to keep Greece in line would be to stagger the bulkier
bail-out payments. The money required to get private
bondholders to take losses cannot be delayed if Greece is to
avoid default. The troika could, however, withhold the funds
reserved to recapitalise Greek banks. That would give them
leverage over the government that is formed after Greece’s
elections, which would have to use promissory notes in lieu of
capital. But it would also spur a fresh round of deposit
flight from banks, worsening the liquidity shortage that has
made the recession so harsh.
Greece’s
euro-zone creditors might be willing to live with that
outcome. They have been emboldened by the success of the
ECB’s three-year bank loans in pushing down bond yields for
troubled-but-solvent countries like Italy and Spain.
Germany’s finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, said on
February 13th that Europe is “better prepared” for a Greek
default than it was two years ago. Perhaps, but without
continuing external support in the event of default, Greece
might also be forced to leave the euro.
There
remain large gaps in the euro zone’s defences against
contagion should that happen. The euro-zone rescue fund,
capped at €500 billion, is designed to rescue only small
countries. Its size is limited by its structure: the more
countries that have to be bailed out, the fewer there are to
take on the burden of rescuer. It could not credibly bail out
Italy, for instance, were that necessary. A jointly issued
Eurobond would allow burden-sharing across all countries but
would also require governments to give up some control over
their tax-and-spending decisions. The reaction in Greece to
impositions by its creditors shows how hard that would be.
The
failings of the euro as a currency zone have barely been
addressed. The lack of a co-ordinated fiscal policy, and the
loss of competitiveness (and banking troubles) at its
periphery, help explain why it has tipped into recession, says
Laurence Boone of Bank of America. The chosen remedies are
fiscal austerity, structural reform and deleveraging by banks.
Given enough time, these measures might restore the zone to
health. But they might first push some countries off the
ledge.
|